Dr Catherine M Jackson
Catherine Jackson is Associate Professor of History of Science and serves on the advisory committee for the Oxford Centre for the History of Science, Medicine, and Technology (OCHSMT).
A PhD chemist and historian of modern chemistry, Dr Jackson has published extensively on the history of nineteenth-century organic chemistry including original studies of Justus Liebig, August Hofmann, Albert Ladenburg, and Emil Fischer; on the history of chemical training and the laboratory: and on chemistry’s material culture, especially the rise of scientific glassblowing.
Dr Jackson’s teaching experience spans the modern period, with a focus on chemistry and its connected sciences, including pharmacy and pharmacology. She is committed to the relevance of history to science students, reflected in her developing involvement with the history of science option in Part II of the Chemistry degree programme.
At graduate level, Dr Jackson teaches methodological approaches, including a course on the material culture approach in history of science, medicine, and technology.
Research Interests
- History of modern chemistry
- History of modern sciences
- History of scientific glassblowing
- Scientific pedagogy and collective practice
- Laboratory history and lab studies
- Material culture studies
As chemist and historian, my interest is in science as a learned, material, collective practice. At present, I’m focused on completing my first book – a history of the origins and development of synthetic organic chemistry in nineteenth-century Germany. My study, called Material World: Making Modern Chemistry, explains the rise of this powerful and productive science. Built on a fundamental revision in our understanding of the accomplishments of one of history’s most famous chemists, Justus Liebig, my study explains why chemists began doing organic synthesis, and what it allowed them to do. It’s a story of personal ambition and heated dispute, of broken dreams and broken glass, of high theory and low cunning, of indecipherable notebooks and imperial ambition. By 1900, organic synthesis had launched mighty industries, transformed molecular understanding of organic nature, and laid the foundations for the molecular life sciences. My book provides the first historical explanation of these remarkable achievements. In doing so it contributes to our understanding of the rise of technical modernity.
Research for Material World highlighted the importance of glass and glassblowing to the science of chemistry, and it led to a collaborative project (founded with master scientific glassblower Tracy Drier, UW-Madison, Chemistry: https://www.chem.wisc.edu/users/drier) that examines the essential role of flame worked glassware in mediating chemists’ interactions with the molecular microworld. The spaces inside glass bring skill, fire, and substance together to make new worlds. Their shape and content are subject to minute control, they’re impervious to corrosive chemicals, yet they’re so fragile almost none remains from the past. Generations of chemists fought over the meaning of these spaces, saw things inside that we cannot, and taught us to share their vision with coloured ball-and-stick models. That’s why I’ve called this project Microheterotopias.
Teaching
I currently teach:
Masters:
- Methods and Themes in the History of Medicine
- Ideas meet Things: Why materiality matters in the history of science
Undergraduate:
Research Centres
Publications
-
Glassware
January 2020|Chapter|Between Making And Knowing: Tools In The History Of Materials ResearchFrom the mid-nineteenth century onwards, every laboratory was filled with glassware, and every trainee scientist learned to work with glass. Not any more. The age of glassware is passing, progressively displaced by the black boxes, new materials, and digital displays of twenty-first century laboratory instrumentation. To anyone under the age of fifty, the contents of this chapter are in danger of appearing like a tale from a strange land. We have already lost much knowledge about glass. All the more reason to write this brief history of glassware in modern science. -
Emil Fischer and the "art of chemical experimentation".
March 2017|Journal article|History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teachingWhat did nineteenth-century chemists know? This essay uses Emil Fischer's classic study of the sugars in 1880s and 90s Germany to argue that chemists' knowledge was not primarily vested in the theories of valence, structure, and stereochemistry that have been the subject of so much historical and philosophical analysis of chemistry in this period. Nor can chemistry be reduced to a merely manipulative exercise requiring little or no intellectual input. Examining what chemists themselves termed the "art of chemical experimentation" reveals chemical practice as inseparable from its cognitive component, and it explains how chemists integrated theory with experiment through reason. -
Liebig’s Kaliapparat and the Origins of Scientific Glassblowing
February 2017|Journal article|Fusion: Journal of the American Scientific Glassblowers Society -
Who was William Hyde Wollaston?
August 2016|Journal article|Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A -
The Laboratory
January 2016|Chapter|Companion to the History of Science