Dr Jonathan Taylor
My research explores the social and political history of twentieth century Britain. I am interested in the history of the family, childhood and adolescence, and the ways in which external agencies came to intervene in what were often thought to be a very private set of relationships.
My research is motivated by a strong belief that rigorous historical research can contribute valuable insights to contemporary policy discussions.
- History of childhood
- Social history
- Modern British history
My current research forms one half of an interdisciplinary project, bringing together the disciplines of history and psychology, which seeks to understand the life-long impact of early life experiences prospectively and to help identify what best supports people across the course of their lives. As part of this work, I have begun to explore a series of essays and drawing created by children in the decades after the Second World War. This research aims to better understand the experiences and social relationships that children and young people considered to be important while growing up.
I am keen to explore opportunities in which the findings historical research can be used to engage with policymakers, practitioners, charities, and members of the public.
Project website: http://www.magd.ox.ac.uk/research/calleva-research-centre/changing-lives/
Investigating Person‐Centred Care Planning in Care Homes Across England: An Exploratory Study of Practices and Contextual Factors
4203 Health Services and Systems
,4205 Nursing
,42 Health Sciences
,8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
,7.1 Individual care needs
,Generic health relevance
,3 Good Health and Well Being
Developing a set of key principles for care planning within older adult care homes: study protocol for a modified Delphi survey.
Developing a set of key principles for care planning within older adult care homes: study protocol for a modified Delphi survey.
<h4>Background</h4>Older adult care homes in England are required to develop care plans on behalf of each of their residents and to make these documents available to those who provide care. However, there is a lack of formal agreement around the key principles that should inform the development of care plans in care homes for older adults. Using a modified Delphi survey, we intend to generate consensus on a set of key principles that should inform the care planning process.<h4>Methods and analysis</h4>A two-stage modified Delphi survey will be used to try to reach a consensus on a set of key principles to inform care planning within older adult care homes in England. An interdisciplinary panel of approximately 50 people with experience in care planning will be convened and invited to provide feedback on a set of key principles. We will use an iterative, quasi-anonymous, multistage approach with controlled feedback. In the first round, panellists will be asked to provide feedback on a draft document whose contents have been informed by a systematic scoping review and consultations with care home staff. The first round will be administered and subsequently analysed. The results from the first round will be fed back to the panel members and panellists will be asked to complete a second survey. In each round, panel members will use a 5-point unipolar scale to rate their agreement with the item. Consensus will be considered if ≥75% of participants rate an item as 4-5.<h4>Ethics and dissemination</h4>This study to which this protocol relates has been granted ethical approval by the University of Kent's Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice Research Committee Ethics Panel (reference: 1006) on 9 April 2024. The results of this project will be disseminated through conferences and one or more peer-reviewed journals. In a subsequent research phase, the research team plans to share the key principles document developed through this modified Delphi survey with care home residents and their families and friends. We plan to invite their feedback through a series of focus groups with a view to developing a related document for the family and friends of care home residents.
Surveys and Questionnaires
,Patient Care Planning
,Humans
,England
,Homes for the Aged
,Delphi Technique
,Consensus
,Nursing Homes
,Aged
,Research Design
Care planning in older adult care homes: a qualitative study of care staff experiences and views
Care planning in older adult care homes: a qualitative study of care staff experiences and views
<jats:p>This study aims to understand how care planning is conducted in English older adult care homes and explore the views of staff involved in care planning. Drawing on 22 semi-structured interviews, the findings of the study are organised around five themes: the aims of care planning; conducting care planning; support and resources for care planning; the use of care planning information; and improving care planning. Our discussion notes the ways in which care staff would like to improve how care planning is conducted but highlights that a lack of resources may make improvement difficult.</jats:p>
8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
,7.1 Individual care needs
,Clinical Research
,44 Human Society
,Behavioral and Social Science
,Minority Health
,3 Good Health and Well Being
Care in the Time of COVID, 2020
Care in the Time of COVID, 2020
The Care in the Time of COVID project aimed to understand the mental health and lived experiences of adults with care experience during the UK’s first COVID-19 lockdown.
Data were collected during the first UK lockdown, between 20 May and 19 June 2020, through an online Qualtrics survey. Participants were asked to self-identify as care-experienced by confirming they had spent some time in the care of a local authority (foster care, kinship care, residential or group home) before 18. They were asked about their: level of education, occupation (current and, prior to, 16 March 2020), access to outdoor space, whether they had been identified by the NHS as vulnerable to COVID-19, and whether they had suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The survey also included three validated measures: the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder assessment (GAD-7), and the Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS).
Participants were also asked to submit a diary in response to one of four prompts. Two of the prompts remained the same throughout the project, and two prompts were changed weekly and were selected by the research team to encourage participants to reflect on a wide range of experiences.
The survey was completed by 204 people. Most participants completed the survey once (n=178), a small number took part twice (n = 22) and four people completed the survey three times. At least one diary entry was provided by 140 people. Some people submitted more than one diary entry. Diaries also include pictures of participants' artwork, photographs and other materials.
COVID-19
,Youth
,Society and culture
,Care Leavers
Implementation of RESTORE2 in Care Homes in England: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
Implementation of RESTORE2 in Care Homes in England: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
<jats:p>Context: Older adults are more susceptible to acute deterioration. Delayed recognition or response is linked to poor health outcomes and adverse events. Identification and management of deterioration is more difficult in this population due to increasingly complex healthcare needs and limited/no healthcare knowledge of some staff. Enhancing ability of care home staff to recognise and communicate concerns could reduce avoidable harm for residents at risk of or experiencing physical deterioration.
Objective: To evaluate the implementation of RESTORE2, a physical deterioration and escalation tool, in care homes.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach, comprising individual semi-structured interviews and online survey, was used. A total of 35 care home staff from 34 care homes took part in this evaluation.
Findings: Implementation of the full RESTORE2 tool was low. Several challenges that impeded successful implementation including complexity, uncertainty over carers’ role in carrying out clinical observations, inadequate training and buy-in from health-service providers, need to be addressed. Nevertheless, some benefits including improved staff knowledge/confidence to identify deterioration, escalate and communicate concerns, as well as potential to reduce unnecessary healthcare utilisation particularly 999 calls and hospital admissions were reported.
Limitations: This study was limited by the small sample size of the quantitative phase. The Covid-19 pandemic affected recruitment and engagement with care homes.
Implications: RESTORE2 has a long way to go to become a common language in social care. Collaboration between health professionals and care staff is important for RESTORE2 to become embedded into practice. Further quantitative and qualitative research is required to strengthen the evidence base. </jats:p>
I currently teach:
Prelims: | FHS: |
Approaches to History | War and Reconstruction: Ideas, Politics and Social Change, 1939-45 |
History of the British Isles 6: Power, Politics, and the People: 1830-1951 |
History of the British Isles 7: Changing Identities,1900-present |
Public engagement blog posts
History & Policy Parenting Forum, ‘Encouraging innovation isn't innovative: Research and looked-after children in the post-war period’, 4 May 2016, https://arts.leeds.ac.uk/parentingforum/2017/05/03/encouraging-innovation-isnt-innovative-research-and-looked-after-children-in-the-post-war-period/
Talking Humanities, ‘Children’s voices at the heart of research on childhood adversity’, 19 April 2016, https://talkinghumanities.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2016/04/19/5769/
Project twitter feed: @ChangingLivesOx